Corporate lobbies are biggest EU lobby spenders, but dodgy data persists

LobbyFacts currently only presents data from the EU lobby transparency register up to 19 September 2021. This is due to recent changes made by the EU register; we are working to present these on LobbyFacts as soon as possible.

May 2nd, 2016
by Vicky Cann

Seventy six per cent of the entries at the top of the lobby register are flawed, according to new research by LobbyFacts. The lobby data-crunching website research shows that of the 51 organisations declaring the highest lobby spend, only 12 are likely to, in fact, be among the biggest lobbyists. There is only one reliable-looking entry among the 30 entries declaring the highest lobby spend. LobbyFacts produced this list by cross-referencing declared spend, with the number of meetings held with senior staff at the Commission and the numbers of European Parliament passes held (plus some common sense!), as good indicators of an organisation’s actual lobby activity. Erik Wesselius, a spokesperson for LobbyFacts said: “The pollution of the register by inaccurate entries, whether over-reporting or under-reporting lobby spend, is endemic. The only solution to this is to get tough: implement a legally-binding lobby register with the ability to apply sanctions so that there is a real disincentive to post inaccurate data. The Commission has tried the carrot approach since 2008; now its time for the stick!” According to this analysis, in the LobbyFacts cleaned-up list, some of the world’s biggest corporate interests appear as top-spending EU lobbyists - Exxon, Shell, Microsoft - as well as trade associations representing the chemicals, finance, insurance and pharma industries. Three lobby firms also appear on the list: Fleishman-Hillard, Burson-Marsteller and Interel. Of the top 12 highest spending lobby organisations, 11 of them (92 per cent) represent corporate interests and between them they spent at least 72,012,760 euros in the most recently declared year. Between them, they held 228 meetings with senior Commission officials (since December 2014, according to IntegrityWatch) and hold 192 European parliamentary access passes.

  Lobby organisation Annual lobby spend in € Meetings with senior Commission reps EP access passes
1 European Chemical Industry Council 10,220,000 37 25
2 EUROCHAMBRES – Association of European Chambers of Commerce and Industry 7,600,000 33 11
3 Association for Financial Markets in Europe 7,250,000 –- 7,499,999 15 7
4 Insurance Europe 7,250,000 -– 7,499,999 19 18
5 Fleishman-Hillard 6,250,000 – 6,499,999 8 49
6 European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations 5,442,760 14 7
7 Burson-Marsteller 5,000,000 –- 5,249,999 4 25
8 EUROCITIES 4,750,000 –- 4,999,999 14 14
9 ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical 4,750,000 –- 4,999,999 12 4
10 Interel European Affairs 4,750,000 -– 4,999,999 1 20
11 Shell Companies 4,500,000 -– 4,749,000 26 8
12 Microsoft Corporation 4,250,000 –- 4,499,999 45 4
  Totals: €7,201,2760 228 192

Erik Wesselius concluded: “More lobby transparency is needed but the EU institutions also need to end the privileged access that corporations and corporate interests currently enjoy”. The LobbyFacts analysis comes on the day that the Commission and Parliament jointly host an event to debate the future of the lobby register, as part of the consultation on transparency. While the Commission has proposed to introduce a mandatory lobby register, it seems clear that this be based on a weak incentives-based approach, rather than the legally-binding approach which many NGOs support. All data was correct as of 29 April 2016.

Other recent articles

January 30th, 2017
by Vicky Cann
One way to assess the relative lobby power of the corporate sector versus the civil society sector (aside from spending levels) is to look at the numbers of lobbyists each sector deploys. Continue Reading
Google logo
December 12th, 2016
by Vicky Cann
Google is, without doubt, one of the most active lobbyists in Brussels. Continue Reading
November 9th, 2016
by Vicky Cann
Will the Commission proposal for a new lobby register lead to less lobbying being declared, rather than more? This is a real possibility if the Commission gets its way. Here is why. Continue Reading
September 1st, 2016
by Vicky Cann
Monitoring lobby data is more important than ever to expose the extent of corporate influence over EU decision making. The relaunch of popular database provides vital new tools for this, including a facility for tracking the lobby spending over several years. Continue Reading
September 1st, 2016
by Vicky Cann
New analysis by LobbyFacts reveals that 2013 was the tobacco industry lobby's top spending year. 2013 represents the height of the lobby battle over the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive and several key industry players dramatically increased their lobby spending to reflect that. Continue Reading
September 1st, 2016
by Vicky Cann
New analysis from LobbyFacts shows a consistent increase in car industry lobby spending from 2011, with a major increase in 2014. The declared spending for the car industry went from €7.6million in 2011 to €20.2million in 2014. Continue Reading